17 Jun, 2026 | 7 min read

Bridging Net 60-90 terms from enterprise and government buyers

Zara Chechi
Zara Chechi

Winning a large enterprise or government IT contract is a milestone — and a cash-flow test. Big buyers do not negotiate payment terms the way a small client might. Procurement imposes them: Net 60, Net 90, sometimes longer, with the terms baked into a framework you sign as a condition of the work. Meanwhile you carry the delivery cost — developers, infrastructure, subcontractors — from day one.

This is a procurement-led cycle, not a relationship you can lean on to get paid faster. It often comes wrapped in clauses that shift risk onto you: suspension rights that let the buyer pause work, and late-payment provisions that may entitle you to statutory interest you would rather not need. This guide is about carrying the cost across those long terms without straining the rest of the business.

A business account built for IT services firms

Open your account
A business account built for IT services firms

Procurement sets the terms, not the relationship

With a small or mid-sized client, payment terms are part of a conversation. With an enterprise or a government department, they are part of a procurement framework. The terms are standardised, applied across all suppliers, and rarely movable for a single vendor — especially a smaller one keen to win the work.

That changes how you should think about the contract. You are not waiting on a slow payer you can chase; you are operating inside a defined cycle where Net 60 or Net 90 is simply how the machine works. Planning around the term is more productive than hoping to shorten it.

You carry the delivery cost the whole time

The hard part is that your costs do not wait for the term. From the first sprint you are paying developers, running infrastructure and possibly paying subcontractors, while the invoice for that work will not clear for two or three months. On a sizeable engagement that is a substantial sum tied up at any moment.

  • Delivery costs start on day one and recur throughout.
  • The first invoice may not clear until well into the project.
  • The longer the term and the larger the contract, the more working capital sits locked in the gap.

Treat the cost of carrying that gap as part of the deal, and price and plan for it rather than discovering it once the work is underway.

Suspension rights and late-payment clauses

Enterprise and government contracts often carry clauses that add to the risk. Suspension rights allow the buyer to pause the engagement — for budget, reorganisation or convenience — while you may still be holding committed delivery resource. Late-payment provisions, including statutory interest on overdue commercial debts in many jurisdictions, are a backstop, but interest you have to claim is not a substitute for cash you can plan around.

Read these clauses before you sign, and assume the term may run to its full length or beyond. The safe planning assumption is that money arrives late within the rules, not early as a favour.

Reserve to carry the term

The defensive move is to fund the gap deliberately rather than absorb it from working balance. Setting aside a reserve sized to the delivery cost you will carry across the payment term means a long Net 90 cycle does not put pressure on payroll or other commitments.

Keeping that reserve visibly separate also tells you the truth about how much capital each enterprise engagement ties up, which is exactly the figure to know before you take on a second or third large contract on similar terms. The more of these you run at once, the more important it is to see the combined gap clearly.

How Altery fits

Altery is not a bank, and this is general information rather than advice, but it suits the shape of enterprise terms. You can ring-fence funds into a reserve pot sized to the delivery cost you will carry across a Net 60-90 term, so the gap does not pull on payroll or other commitments. Real-time balances let you watch the working capital each engagement ties up and manage several long-term contracts side by side. And multi-currency accounts holding USD, EUR or GBP help when the enterprise or government buyer is in another country and pays in another currency.

Frequently asked questions

Usually not. Large buyers impose terms through procurement frameworks that apply to all suppliers and are rarely movable for a single vendor. It is generally more productive to plan around Net 60-90 as a fixed feature of the contract than to count on shortening it.

A suspension clause lets the buyer pause the engagement, sometimes for convenience, while you may still be holding committed delivery resource. It shifts timing risk onto you, so it is worth reading carefully before signing and factoring into how much cost you commit up front.

Not really. Many jurisdictions entitle you to interest on overdue commercial debts, but interest you have to claim is a backstop, not cash you can plan around. The safer assumption is that payment arrives at the end of the term within the rules, and to fund the gap yourself in the meantime.

A practical approach is to size the reserve to the delivery cost you will carry across the full term, including the chance it runs to its limit. Keeping it separate also shows how much working capital each enterprise contract ties up, which matters before taking on several on similar terms.

This guide is general information to help IT services businesses and is not financial, tax or legal advice. Altery is not a bank. Check your own circumstances before acting.

Run your consulting and delivery finances from one account

Open your account
Run your consulting and delivery finances from one account

Keep reading

05 Jun, 2026 | 7 min read

The staff-augmentation gap: paying developers before clients pay you

Placing developers means paying salaries every cycle while large client invoices sit unpaid on Net 30-60 terms. Here is how to manage that structural gap.

Zara Chechi Zara Chechi
12 Jun, 2026 | 7 min read

Milestone billing and acceptance gates in software delivery

When each invoice depends on a client accepting the deliverable, a slipped sign-off slips your cash, even though you have already paid the team that built it. Here is how to plan for it.

Zara Chechi Zara Chechi
13 Jun, 2026 | 7 min read

Matching your billing model to your cash flow

Time-and-materials, fixed-price and milestone billing each load your working capital in a different rhythm. Choosing the wrong one for your firm can starve cash even on a profitable project.

Zara Chechi Zara Chechi
Open account