Getting paid through public education-funding programmes

Some education technology is not paid for entirely by the school that uses it. A publicly funded education-technology programme can cover part of the cost, with a programme administrator, rather than the school directly, ultimately funding the subsidised portion. That is good for adoption, but it changes how and when you get paid, because the money now comes from two payers on two different timelines.

This guide looks at the two common structures for being paid under such a programme, where the cash gets split and delayed, and how to keep the subsidised receivable straight. It is general information, not financial or tax advice, so confirm your own position before acting on it.

Two ways the money reaches you

Publicly funded education-technology programmes tend to pay you through one of two structures. Under discounted billing, you bill the school only its non-discounted share, and then invoice the programme administrator separately for the subsidised portion. Under reimbursement, the school pays you in full for the product and itself claims the subsidy back from the programme afterwards.

The structure you are in determines who owes you what. With discounted billing, part of your revenue is a receivable directly from the programme administrator. With reimbursement, the school pays you in full and the programme relationship is theirs, not yours. The US E-Rate programme, administered by a government-designated administrator, is one well-known example of this discounted-billing model, but the same shape appears wherever public money subsidises education technology, so it is worth understanding generically.

Why the cash is split and delayed

Under discounted billing, the subsidised portion is not a normal customer receivable. It is owed by a programme, paid on the programme's timeline and against the programme's paperwork, not the school's. The school's smaller, non-discounted share may settle on ordinary terms, while the larger subsidised slice sits waiting on the administrator. Your cash for a single sale therefore arrives in two pieces, at two different times, from two different payers.

The programme side also tends to have rules attached. The subsidised portion can typically only be invoiced after services have actually started, and there is usually a filing deadline by which the claim must be submitted. Miss the window or get the paperwork wrong and the subsidised cash can be delayed or lost, even though you have already delivered. The discounted share you billed the school is not the whole picture, and it is not paid just because the school has paid its part.

Track the subsidised receivable separately

The practical discipline is to treat the subsidised portion as its own receivable from the moment you make the sale, separate from the school's direct share. That way you can see how much programme money is outstanding, which claims have been filed, and which deadlines are coming up, rather than burying it inside ordinary customer balances where a late or missing disbursement is easy to overlook.

It also matters not to assume the discounted portion is paid the moment the school pays its share. The two are independent. Reconcile the school's payment against the non-discounted share you billed it, and reconcile the programme disbursement separately against the subsidised portion, hitting each filing deadline along the way. Keeping the two streams distinct is what stops a delayed programme payment from quietly turning into a write-off.

How Altery fits

Altery gives you multi-currency business accounts that hold USD, EUR and GBP, so you have somewhere clean to receive a programme administrator's disbursement, including a USD account if the programme pays in dollars. Real-time balances let you see exactly when the subsidised payment has actually arrived, rather than assuming it has because the school paid its share.

Ring-fencing money into pots or sub-accounts lets you hold and track the subsidised-portion receivable separately from the school's direct payment, so the two streams never blur together. Categorised, real-time records help you reconcile each disbursement against the claim it relates to and keep an eye on filing deadlines, and multi-entity management helps if different programmes or regions sit in different companies. Altery is not a bank, and this is general information rather than advice, so confirm the rules of any specific programme before relying on them.

Frequently asked questions